Product Code: ETC4391222 | Publication Date: Jul 2023 | Updated Date: Jun 2025 | Product Type: Report | |
Publisher: 6Wresearch | Author: Bhawna Singh | No. of Pages: 85 | No. of Figures: 45 | No. of Tables: 25 |
The United States Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market is witnessing significant growth driven by the increasing number of cyber threats and data breaches. DAST tools provide automated scanning and testing capabilities to identify vulnerabilities in web applications during runtime, making them essential for organizations to secure their digital assets. The market is characterized by the presence of key players such as IBM, Micro Focus, Synopsys, and Veracode offering a wide range of DAST solutions to cater to the diverse needs of businesses across various industries. The adoption of DAST solutions is increasing among enterprises to comply with regulatory requirements and protect sensitive data from malicious attacks, driving the market growth. Additionally, the growing emphasis on application security and the shift towards DevSecOps practices are further propelling the demand for DAST solutions in the US market.
The US Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing adoption of cloud-based applications and the rising number of cyber threats. Companies are increasingly investing in DAST solutions to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities in their web and mobile applications. Key trends in the market include the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities into DAST tools to enhance detection accuracy and reduce false positives. Additionally, there is a growing emphasis on automation and scalability to keep pace with the rapid development cycles of modern applications. As organizations prioritize application security to protect their sensitive data and maintain customer trust, the US DAST market is expected to continue expanding in the coming years.
In the US Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) market, challenges are primarily related to the increasing complexity of software applications and the evolving threat landscape. DAST tools may struggle to effectively scan and identify vulnerabilities in applications that are built using modern technologies such as cloud computing, microservices, and APIs. Additionally, the rapid pace of software development and deployment often leads to frequent updates and changes in applications, making it challenging for DAST solutions to keep up and provide accurate assessments. Furthermore, the shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals capable of effectively utilizing DAST tools poses a significant hurdle in maximizing the potential of these solutions. Overall, addressing these challenges requires continuous innovation in DAST technology, enhanced automation capabilities, and comprehensive training programs for security professionals.
The US Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) market presents significant investment opportunities due to the growing demand for cybersecurity solutions. With the increasing number of cyber threats and data breaches, organizations are prioritizing the security of their applications. DAST tools help identify and remediate vulnerabilities in software applications, providing crucial protection against potential cyber attacks. Investing in companies that offer DAST solutions, such as software providers or cybersecurity firms, can be a profitable opportunity as the market continues to expand. Additionally, with regulations and compliance requirements driving the need for robust security measures, the demand for DAST solutions is expected to increase further, making it a promising investment option in the cybersecurity sector.
The US government has implemented various policies and regulations that impact the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) market. These include legislation such as the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA), which require government agencies and certain private sector entities to maintain robust cybersecurity measures, including regular DAST testing. Additionally, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provides guidelines and frameworks for cybersecurity practices, including recommendations for DAST tools and processes. The US government`s focus on cybersecurity and data protection has led to increased demand for DAST solutions in both the public and private sectors, as organizations strive to comply with regulatory requirements and safeguard their digital assets.
The future outlook for the US Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) market appears promising, driven by the increasing adoption of cloud-based applications, rising cyber threats, and stringent regulatory requirements. Businesses across various industries are recognizing the importance of securing their applications against vulnerabilities and attacks, leading to a growing demand for DAST solutions. Additionally, the shift towards DevOps and agile development practices is further fueling the need for continuous security testing throughout the software development lifecycle. As a result, market players are expected to focus on innovation and development of advanced DAST tools to cater to the evolving needs of organizations. Overall, the US DAST market is anticipated to experience steady growth in the coming years as organizations prioritize application security to safeguard their digital assets.
1 Executive Summary |
2 Introduction |
2.1 Key Highlights of the Report |
2.2 Report Description |
2.3 Market Scope & Segmentation |
2.4 Research Methodology |
2.5 Assumptions |
3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Overview |
3.1 United States (US) Country Macro Economic Indicators |
3.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, 2021 & 2031F |
3.3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market - Industry Life Cycle |
3.4 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market - Porter's Five Forces |
3.5 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume Share, By Type, 2021 & 2031F |
3.6 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume Share, By Application, 2021 & 2031F |
3.7 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume Share, By Deployment Mode, 2021 & 2031F |
3.8 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume Share, By Organization Size, 2021 & 2031F |
3.9 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume Share, By Vertical, 2021 & 2031F |
4 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Dynamics |
4.1 Impact Analysis |
4.2 Market Drivers |
4.3 Market Restraints |
5 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Trends |
6 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, By Types |
6.1 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, By Type |
6.1.1 Overview and Analysis |
6.1.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Type, 2021 - 2031F |
6.1.3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Solution , 2021 - 2031F |
6.1.4 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Services, 2021 - 2031F |
6.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, By Application |
6.2.1 Overview and Analysis |
6.2.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Web, 2021 - 2031F |
6.2.3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Mobile Security, 2021 - 2031F |
6.3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, By Deployment Mode |
6.3.1 Overview and Analysis |
6.3.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By On-Premises, 2021 - 2031F |
6.3.3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Cloud, 2021 - 2031F |
6.4 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, By Organization Size |
6.4.1 Overview and Analysis |
6.4.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By SMEs, 2021 - 2031F |
6.4.3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Large Enterprises, 2021 - 2031F |
6.5 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market, By Vertical |
6.5.1 Overview and Analysis |
6.5.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Government & Defense, 2021 - 2031F |
6.5.3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By BFSI, 2021 - 2031F |
6.5.4 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By IT & Telecom, 2021 - 2031F |
6.5.5 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Healthcare, 2021 - 2031F |
6.5.6 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Retail, 2021 - 2031F |
6.5.7 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenues & Volume, By Manufacturing, 2021 - 2031F |
7 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Import-Export Trade Statistics |
7.1 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Export to Major Countries |
7.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Imports from Major Countries |
8 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Key Performance Indicators |
9 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market - Opportunity Assessment |
9.1 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Opportunity Assessment, By Type, 2021 & 2031F |
9.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Opportunity Assessment, By Application, 2021 & 2031F |
9.3 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Opportunity Assessment, By Deployment Mode, 2021 & 2031F |
9.4 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Opportunity Assessment, By Organization Size, 2021 & 2031F |
9.5 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Opportunity Assessment, By Vertical, 2021 & 2031F |
10 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market - Competitive Landscape |
10.1 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Revenue Share, By Companies, 2024 |
10.2 United States (US) Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Competitive Benchmarking, By Operating and Technical Parameters |
11 Company Profiles |
12 Recommendations |
13 Disclaimer |